Allison Martin. Brinkley. English 9 Honors Block 3. 24

Allison Martin Brinkley English 9 Honors Block 3 24 January 2017 Research Paper The Influence of Walt Disney This world has existed for millions of years; in all of that time there has been a countless amount of people who have done fantastic things. Walter Elias Disney was one of those people that influenced not just a few people, but millions. Disney has done the unimaginable and while doing that he pushed others to do so as well. He impacted the lives of everyone watching him by serving as a role model. Disney was also a monumental influence of the mass media. Finally, he left a lasting impression on the world by leaving behind his intentions for his company. To begin with, Walt Disney served as a role model for everyone watching†¦show more content†¦They forget. They don’t remember what it’s like to be 12 years old. They patronize, they treat children as inferiors. Well I won’t do that.† – Walt Disney (Brown) To conclude, Walt Disney was a wonderful role model for everyone watching him, no matter their age. Secondl y, Disney had a huge impact on the mass media. Throughout his career he did not just influence people s lives, but he influenced the entire mass media.(Johnson) Walt Disney made a variety of films. He even had his very own weekly, one hour shows that were produced by ABC on television.(Pettinger) Furthermore, Many animators all had the same type of films, on the other hand Disney s characters were much different than the usual ones you would see, therefore Disney was offering a new kind of films for the public. If you have ever seen a Disney movie you would see that his movies are appealing to all ages, by doing this he has adjusted the entire field of family entertainment.(Johnson) Also, unlike most filmmakers, Walt Disney had one specific goal when he made his movies and television shows, which was to make people happy. He did not focus on the money or the fame, all that mattered to him was seeing that his movies were positively effecting his viewers lives.(Brown) He began using t he money he made while making movies to go towards creating his Disney Theme Parks, and once the parks were open he used the mass media to support and promote these theme parks. In fact, he used advertising

Shulamith Firestone Radical Feminist, Theorist, Author

Known for: radical feminist theoryOccupation: writerDates: born 1945, died August 28, 2012Also known as: Shulie Firestone Background Shulamith (Shulie) Firestone was a feminist theorist known for her book The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, published when she was only 25 years old. Born in Canada in 1945 to an Orthodox Jewish family, Shulamith Firestone moved to the United States as a child and graduated from the Art Institute of Chicago. She was the subject of a short 1967 documentary called Shulie, part of a series of films made by Chicago art students. The film followed a typical day in her life with scenes of commuting, working, and making art. Although never released, the film was revisited in a shot-by-shot simulacrum remake in 1997, also called Shulie. The original scenes were faithfully recreated but she was played by an actress. Feminist Groups Shulamith Firestone helped create several radical feminist groups. With Jo Freeman, she started The Westside Group, an early consciousness-raising group in Chicago. In 1967, Firestone was one of the founding members of New York Radical Women. When NYRW split into factions amid disagreement about what direction the group should take, she launched Redstockings with Ellen Willis. The members of Redstockings rejected the existing political left. They accused other feminist groups of still being part of a society that oppressed women. Redstockings drew attention when its members disrupted a 1970 abortion hearing in New York City at which the scheduled speakers were a dozen men and a nun. Redstockings later held its own hearing, allowing women to testify about abortion. Shulamith Firestone’s Published Works In her 1968 essay â€Å"The Women’s Rights Movement in the U.S.A: New View,† Shulamith Firestone asserted that women’s rights movements have always been radical, and have always been strongly opposed and stamped out.  She pointed out that it was extremely difficult for 19th-century women to take on the church, the entrenched law of white male power, and the â€Å"traditional† family structure that ably served the industrial revolution. Portraying suffragists as old ladies gently persuading men to allow them to vote was an effort to minimize both the women’s struggle and the oppression against which they fought. Firestone insisted the same thing was happening to 20th-century feminists. Shulamith Firestone’s best-known work is the 1970 book The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. In it, Firestone says that a culture of sex discrimination can be traced back to the biological structure of life itself. She claims that society may have evolved to a point with advanced reproductive technology where women could be liberated from â€Å"barbaric† pregnancy and painful childbirth. By eliminating this fundamental difference between the sexes, sex discrimination could finally be eliminated. The book became an influential text of feminist theory and is often remembered for the notion that women could seize the means of reproduction.  Kathleen Hanna and Naomi Wolf, among others, have noted the book’s importance as a part of feminist theory.   Shulamith Firestone disappeared from the public eye after the early 1970s. After struggling with mental illness, in 1998 she published Airless Spaces, a collection of short stories about characters in New York City who drift in and out of mental hospitals. The Dialectic of Sex was reissued in a new edition in 2003. On August 28, 2012, Shulamith Firestone was found dead in her apartment in New York City.

Muralism and the Cosmic Affect Free Essays

03/17/13 Muralism and The Cosmic Race In the Cosmic Race written by Jose Vasconcelo, Vasconcelo writes about the definition of Latin American people and their divine mission in America, while also briefly comparing them to other races such as the Europeans. Vasconcelo states that there are 4 racial trunks, the Blacks, the Indians, the Mongols, and the Whites, while expanding detail with the Whites who he described as organizing themselves in Europe, and becoming invaders of the rest of the world. Vasconcelo gives an example as the Spaniards conquered Latin American, however he believes that their role was just to reintegrate the red world, which he describes as a bridge which has brought the world to a state at which all human types and cultures can fuse together. We will write a custom essay sample on Muralism and the Cosmic Affect or any similar topic only for you Order Now According to Vasconcelo the faithful Latin-people are those called upon to this divine mission after they have gained freedom. It is safe to say Vasconcelo easily inspired and influenced several aspects of Diego Rivera’s artwork. While Mexico was under similar circumstances after the Mexican Revolution as Latin America, Deigo Rivera used some of Jose Vasconcelo’s ideas to impart social and political messages. In Diego Rivera’s â€Å"El Hombre en Cruco de Caminos† located in Palacio de Bellas Artes in Mexico City, one can see a man who appears to be in control of the Universe with a variety of people in the backgrounds. At one point Vasconcelo states that every ascending race needs to constitute its own philosophy to get to its own success, rather than just learn and copy from the others. This idea is expressed in Rivera’s Mural by the man in the middle who is controlling what seems to be the entire universe. It seems that both of these men understood the ideathat it was time to control themselves. Although Diego was focused on the â€Å"spiritual† liberation of Mexico from its Colonial obsession, the idea of creating and controlling your own ideology and destiny is shared by Rivera’s painting and Vasconcelo’s, The Cosmic Race. How to cite Muralism and the Cosmic Affect, Papers

Is Shylock a villain or victim in Shakespeares The Merchant of Venice Essay Example For Students

Is Shylock a villain or victim in Shakespeares The Merchant of Venice Essay The overall climax of this play is brilliantly displayed because the realism of the discrimination and prejudice towards Jews helps us to develop a sympathetic feeling for them. Shakespeare has included the historical and incorporated the biblical references in the speeches of this play. Examples such as the story of Jacob and his sheep from the Book of Genesis Chapter 30 quoted by Shylock to justify his way of doing business. Typically, all of the Jews in Europe experienced a lot of discrimination from Christians during the Middle Ages because of their different appearances, lifestyles, laws and their religion. Shakespeare wrote this play for the Christian audience during the Elizabethan times. They were very prejudiced towards religions that were not pure Christian and would have hated the Jews because they had supposedly murdered Jesus Christ. Additionally, in reference to the mythological story of the Wondering Jew who was condemned to an everlasting life of misery, had developed an evil character who was believed to kidnap and murder Christian children. This is a personification of exile and Christian condemnation of the Jewish people. Because of this Christians would also have a sense of xenophobia because they feared that Jews would take their land and their wealth from them. During the sixteenth century, the victimised Jews would be forced to live in dreaded isolated areas called ghettos by anti-Semitic leaders such as Martin Luther who was possessed by the devil said the Vatican chiefs exorcist. The ghettos were often densely populated and many Jews died of hunger and disease because of poverty and social restrictions. Throughout history, many rulers, empires and nations have oppressed their Jewish populations or have attempted to eradicate them entirely such as the Holocaust during World War II when Hitler forced the Jews into concentration camps and executed them one by one. Ultimately, the contents of this play are comedy, love and betrayal, meaning that it fulfils the audience at the time by condemning and/or serving justice to the evil characters (Shylock is the villain in this case) and the good characters are successful (which in this case is Antonio) and the audiences reaction to Shylock would be stereotypical and would have classified him as just another Jew. Shylock is first introduced in the third scene of act one. His appearance was hardly noticeable and his entrance was slightly delayed. As a result of this there was great anticipation leading up to his eventual appearance. His first confrontation was with Bassanio who arranges an agreement in which he can borrow some money from Shylock. Shylocks attitude towards Bassanio is sincere but cautious. He says he will do business with him and negotiate with him but he will not eat with him. He declines the invitation due to the fact that he hates Christians and he cannot eat pork because of his religion. Bassanio: If it please you to dine with us Shylock: I will buy with you, sell with you, talk with you, walk with you, and so following; but I will not eat with you, drink with you, nor pray with you Here, Shylock explains that he cannot participate in any activities with a Christian that concerns breaking his religions boundaries. Shylock is later confronted by Antonio who he has had past dealings of discrimination and business with before, as a result their emotions are sharply concealed with one another. In the play, Shylock speaks to the audience aside and insults Antonio. Shylock : How like a fawning publican he looks! I hate him for he is a Christian; Here, Shylock angrily expresses his hatred for Antonio and the religion of Christianity. Antonio is in fact annoyed because all he wants is to borrow the money and have nothing to do with Shylocks disturbed emotions (which have been supposedly put aside, although Shylock does not see it this way). Typically, up to the point where he says he hates him because he is a Jew it is imaginable that you can see the Elizabethan audiences mocking, booing and perhaps throwing things at him because of the austerity of their religion against others. Shylock later begins to provoke Antonio for his personal differences between them into charging interest in the loan. But Antonio mentions that friends should not take advantage of each other by charging interest. They finally agree to the bond but Shylock will allow it only under one condition. Shylock: If you repay me not on such a day, In such a place, such sum or sums as are Expressed in the condition, let the forfeit Be nominated for an equal pound Of your fair flesh, to be cut off and taken In what part of your body pleaseth me. Antonio: Content, in faith! Ill seal to such a bond, And say there is much kindness in the Jew. Here, Shylock offers a fair trade if his money was not returned to him in the time he wished then for an action sanctioned by a lawyer he can be allowed to cut off any part of Antonios body (presumably the heart!). Antonio agrees and promises to return the money in good time. The typical Elizabethan audiences reaction towards this would have been to object and they would mentally view him as the devil himself for taking a part of a Christians body. 20th Century Drama - An Inspector Calls EssayFailing to pay Shylock back, Antonio is arrested and sent to court in which to decide his fate with Shylock holding the blade. The trial scene at the end is quite possibly the most powerful scene in the play because it displays the betrayal of law that grants Shylock the right to cast revenge and the superiority between Christianity and Judaism. Antonio is greeted by the Duke of Venice who shows pity for him and discriminates against Shylock by saying that he can neither express pity nor mercy. The Duke addresses them both and the reasons for the forfeit of the bond are explained by Shylock when his only intentions are to make Antonio pay for he hates him is good a reason as any other therefore the Duke proceeds and introduces the lawyers clerk who is Nerissa in disguise and Portia who is disguised as Doctor Balthazar. During the first half of the session, the law was on Shylocks side as he also appears triumphant and remorseless. Shylock only explains that he wants to own Antonio by taking a part of his flesh and that his revenge is served. Bassanio who arrives within the hour, immediately offers Shylock six thousand ducats, twice the amount of the original finance but Shylock declines the offer and only says that he would not give in to money only to dish his revenge out on Antonio. Strictly speaking, Venetian society is made an accomplice to Shylocks devilish intentions, and since this support does not pardon him, it can have the inevitable result of bringing everyone else down to his level and he only wants his needs to be regarded with respect like everyone elses. As the proceedings went on, Portia reveals her courtroom speech about the quality of mercy: Portia: The quality of mercy is not straind, It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven Upon the place beneath: it is twice blest; Here, Portia says that Shylock shall have all justice and gives him the right to choose whether or not he wants or does not want to proceed with the punishment. Further on, Portia introduces images of royal power to indicate that the power of God goes above all and those who have mercy are like God himself. continued : Tis mightiest in the mightiest: it becomes The throned monarch better than his crown; His sceptre shows the force of temporal power, The attribute to awe and majesty, But Shylock on the other hand is simply determined to exact his revenge upon Antonio without any offerings that may cause him to stop this. The ideas of mercy displayed here are interesting because what Portia has mentioned here is a relativist view about mercy; Christians should turn the other cheek (from the New Testament) instead of doing the same to the adversary but Shylock has an absolutist view of justice which is clearly an eye for an eye that is derived from the Old Testament. During the moment in which Shylock draws the blade, Portia startles Shylock by stating another rule and does not permit Shylock to withdraw from the agreement. She says that a penalty is included if blood is spilt. In a way, she has twisted the law with superior reasoning; additionally she reads the letter of law and states that he must be executed if he took more or less than a pound of flesh. Shylock painfully admits that he cannot carry it out and is crushed by the legal punishment unless the Duke showed mercy and the fact that he had lost his money to his daughters Christian husband, Lorenzo. On top of that, Antonio is released and inflicts an overly harsh punishment forcing Shylock to convert to Christianity. Ultimately, he holds his faith and his life is spared but he would rather be dead because his money is distributed among his enemies and his revenge is wasted therefore he has not much to live for. This creates a very sympathetic emotion from the audience towards Shylock despite his lust for revenge. To conclude, I believe that Shylock is a victim because despite the fact that he treats his daughter callously he is constantly bogged down with disrespect from the outside world which demoralises him. Although he lets his lust of vengeance overwhelm the other aspects of his life, he still possesses some heart towards others that are kind to him. That in particular encourages me to feel sympathetic towards Shylock because he may never receive a fair hearing about him since everywhere he goes he is continuously ridiculed and spat on by Christians. To some extent, I believe that Shakespeare had intended to portray him as a victim also since the character was meant to undertake the Christian law and society of the Elizabethan age and confront some certain prejudice and intolerance. Furthermore, Shakespeare had also included a vast element of a wicked character in Shylock, representing the immorality of Jews therefore making the play in favour of the Christian audience.