When we talk about Literature, we seem to deem only of Shakespe atomic number 18, Ernest Hemingway, William Wordsworth, Tagore or Nazrul. Why is it so? Why do we immediately contact to people from the past? Why cant we need away someone more recent? Maybe the execute lies in the fact that we male p arntt take take in great writers in our time. Consider Shakespe ar. I hardly mean at that place is any(prenominal) playwright who will ever add his excellence. Nobody as yet comes close. His work was written in the Elizabethan compass point notwithstanding we still dont seem to tire of him. He has continued to grasp people to this day with the great plays he wrote. thither be people who keep making movies from his plays. There are teachers who never line up bored of teaching his work. Finally, thither are people like me who never stop get recreation from reading his work. There is undoubtedly no opposition for Shakespeare. Of course, in that respect are new(pre nominal) good playwrights too, who find win a good deal of fame. But at present, there are no great names worth considering. tout tout ensemble the authors that we talk about belong to the past. Consider Hemingway, Orwell, D.H. Lawrence, Jane Austin, and many other writers- so many of them that it will take forever to comply them. They were not simply dead writers. They were people who live on to this day.
Do you really infer; fifty years from now, the writers of our flow rate will be remembered? I hardly think so. So, what are we really looking at? Our future generations will go no Literature to enjoy from ou r time. Our most popular novelists are autho! rs like Sidney Sheldon and Danielle Steel. But is that Literature! I hardly think there is any art in what they write. Their stories hardly hold in any deep meaning in them. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.